Analysis of Annual report with respect to compliance with AASB


Executive Summary:

This research report is related to the individual assignments which will helps to understand us about the accounting standard issued by the AASB and their practical use in the business by corporations. In this research report we will focus on the employee benefit provide by the organization and compensation for executives for the organization. For the analysis of this research and preparation of report we have selected two different companies listed in the Australia stock exchange based on the requirement of assignment. For the purpose of analysis and research we have check the annual report of both the companies and their views to comply with the AASB. Also we have compared the financial statement of both the companies and analyze the financial statement accordingly. Our selected companies for analysis are Adairs Limited and Gateway Mining Limited.


Table of Contents









Introduction – For the analysis of annual report with AASB we have selected two different Australian companies listed in ASX. From the selected company, Gateway Mining Limited in mining company which explore the gold and other metal and other company Adairs limited are in business of home ware and furniture in Australia. For the analysis of our topic of executive compensation and employee benefit we have make detail analysis about the preparation of annual report of the organization with AASB compliance.  
For preparation and presentation of financial statement of Australian company, Australian accounting standard board issued AASB 101 which is basic accounting standard hence every organization need   to comply with the it for proper compliance with accounting standard.  AASB 101 is used for the prudence following of accounting policies and conceptual framework of accounting concepts hence we have to comply with the ASSB 101. Other than AASB 101 we have analyzed the other accounting standard relate to the employee benefit and statutory requirement related to it. For the employee benefit and measurement of retirement benefit of employee benefit organization should comply with the AASB 119 and AASB 1028 hence we have analyzed both this both the standard from annual report. Also with that in respect to the disclosure requirement about the executive should be according to the AASB 124 and AASB 1046 hence we have also analyzed both the standard and annual report for understand the organization compliance about the AASB in preparation of annual report. Measurement of employee benefit is not much easy task hence Board instructed to the organization for using the actuarial method for valuation of employee benefit by way of AASB 119. Employee benefit includes many facilities and pay provided by organization for their continuous service to the organization. Employees are one of the important assets of the organization hence organization need to take care of the disclosure requirement about the employee in annual report. Benefit paid to employee cannot measured in terms of numerical value hence now according to the requirement of standard most of organizations are not disclosing the amount of employee benefit in the face of annual report but they are providing the measurement and future plan in notes to account.
AASB 119 for employee benefit – AASB 119 is initiated by the board with intent to improve disclosure about the employee benefit in the annual report. AASB required disclosing the liability related to employee, which is related to current year and liability related to future period should be discounted in the present if it can be measured in numerical value.  It also required for recognizing the expense paid or payable to the employee in the period in which service of employee taken. AASB 119 has been change from the year 2013 in which board incorporated changes by considering some measurement parameter for recognition and presentation of expenses incurred on employee benefit. Board makes effective the changes from the year 2013 as well. Organization also needs to disclose the impact of changes with the change of accounting policy in the financial statement according to the AASB 101 requirement. In respect of change made in AASB 119 have following additional requirement for the organization -
Ø  All actuarial gain and loss should be recognized immediately – With the change in AASB 119 organization need to re measure all employee benefit by using actuarial method which cause gain and loss to the organization. Gain and loss from the re measure should be recognized immediately with the comprehensive income. All the actuarial loss and gain will be arise due to change in assumption according to the revised AASB 119.
Ø  Disclosing of expense incurred for defined benefit   - With the revision of AASB 119 organization need to disclose following component in the head of defined benefit –
-          Expense incurred to pay for service cost which is recognized in P&L account.
-          Net Interest expense concerning to the assists and liability related to defined benefit recognized in P & L Account.
-          Re measurement of assets and liability concern to the concerns to the defined benefit from the comprehensive income.

Ø  Other additional requirement for disclosure of defined benefit plan – With the revision  in the standard AASB 119 their some additional requirement for the organization which organization should comply in preparation of  financial statement –
-          Provide description about the defined benefit plan, characteristics and risk related to the plan.
-          Disclosure of the reconciliation of calculation of defined benefit from the calculation of before revision numerical value.
-          Sensitivity analysis of future cash flow for benefit plan by considering timing, rate, discount, and uncertainty.

Ø  Recognition of termination benefit in annual report – With the revision of AASB 119 organization need to recognize the expenditure which is considered by the organization as restructuring cost. Restructuring cost cannot be withdrawn by the organization.


Analysis of Annual report of Gateway Mining Limited -

Measurement of employee benefit is not much easy task hence Board instructed to the organization for using the actuarial method for valuation of employee benefit by way of AASB 119. Employee benefit includes many facilities and pay provided by organization for their continuous service to the organization. Employees are one of the important assets of the organization hence organization need to take care of the disclosure requirement about the employee in annual report. Benefit paid to employee cannot measured in terms of numerical value hence now according to the requirement of standard most of organizations are not disclosing the amount of employee benefit in the face of annual report but they are providing the measurement and future plan in notes to account.  But Gateway Mining Limited discloses the employee benefit expense in the profit and loss account I separate heading.  In the notes of account company mentioned that amount which is payable within one year is considered as amount expected to be paid to  employee and amount which is due after one year are discounted in the present year for appropriate measurement of liability related to employee.
Gateway mining has incurred employee benefit expense in the year 2014 of $22862 which is reduced in the year 2015 to 19960 by 12.70% compared to year 2014. But organization not discloses the liability relate to the employee benefit in the face of financial statement.
Short term employee benefits are measured in the year in which they are incurred but expenses which are related to the future are discounted in the present value terms.
Superannuation expense of the employee are considered in the year in which that is incurred hence need not discount it on the current year in terms of present value.
Note one of the notes to account disclosed that how share based payment is paid in terms of equity to the employee of the organization.  If equity is awarded to the employee then minimum expense will be recognized and remaining expense will be recognized over the period of time of vesting period.
From the whole analysis of annual report it is very clear that organization is not following the AASB 15 and AASB 9 which will be effective from 2018 hence organization will comply with this standard from the year 2018 as Gateway mining not adopting any standard before effective adoption by board.
If we analyze the annual report of Adairs Limited than we found that they have disclose the employee benefit in the face of annual report. In the financial statement they disclose separately for senior executive remuneration in head of statutory disclosure. Organization disclosed the cash salary, bonus, superannuation benefit and non monetary benefit for short term as well as long term employee benefit, share based payment and terminal benefit to the executives.
In the face of profit and loss account organization recognized the employee benefit expense which is $39595000 for the year 2014 and 49618000 for 2015 hence increase in the expense hence increase in employee benefit in the year 2015 will be 20% from year 2014.
In the notes to account of annual report Adairs recognized that organization recognized the expenses related to 12 months in the financial statement and liability related to this are considered based on expected  amount to be paid to the employee for this.
Liability for long term service to be measured in the present value of expected future payment by using actuarial valuation method.
Superannuation of executive and employee are considered but it is varied according to their job position hence we have measured by using actuarial method of valuation.
Organization is not paying any share based payment in the year 2015 hence they need not to disclose in the financial statement. For the preparation of annual report Adairs used the AASB with corporation Act 2001 to comply with statutory requirement.
We have analyzed the disclosure and presentation of annual report of both the organization but looking to the annual report it precise clears that presentation and disclosure of annual report of Gateway mining is much better than Adairs as Gateway mining disclose everything in the financial statement according to the AASB and also provide clarification in notes to account about the policies. No doubt both the company are operating business in different industry as one company are in the business of home appliances whereas other one is in mining of gold. But disclosure of the employee benefit should not make difference. Gateway mining adopts the applicable accounting standard timely but Adairs limited adopt the standard as and when it will become effective. Also looking to the notes to account of both the organization it is clear that notes to account of Gateway Mining are more precise and according to the AASB. As Gateway mining disclose the information about the policy adopted for the measurement in notes to account and impact of the adoption of the policy in notes to account as well.
Therefore annual report of Gateway mining can be considered in line with AASB and statutory requirement of corporation Act 2001.
Conclusion – Accounting body issued the accounting standard to make the financial statement comparable and standard which help to the investor for bring confidence on financial statement. Accounting standard issued by the body are for the purpose of nullify the issued faced by the organization in today era but due to difference in adoption of   accounting standard by the organization not bring harmony in the financial statement of all the organization. Also investors also have ambiguity about the annual report as different financial statement reflects different result by using different policy hence objective of the hence all the organization should use the single policy and disclosure in the annual report. As per AASB 1053 applicability of AASB is based on the tier of the as private organization are fall in tier 2 hence they have same AASB applicability.
Management of the organization is responsible for compliance with the financial statement with annual report hence organization should follow the AASB and statutory obligation at the time of preparation of annual report.  AASB are issued to harmonize the financial statement of within country but if organizations are not following the AASB issued by the board than objective of issuance of AASB could not achieve. Organization should comply with all the requirement related to executive and employees benefit hence all should be disclose in the annual report. 
Bennet, C. (2015). Changes to AASB 119 Employee benefits measurement and recognition | Deloitte Australia | Actuaries & Consultants services. [online] Deloitte Australia. Available at: http://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/human-capital/articles/changes-aasb-119.html [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Aasb.gov.au, (2015). Accounting standards. [online] Available at: http://www.aasb.gov.au/Pronouncements/Current-standards.aspx [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Ltd, B. (2015). What’s new for June 2014 annual financial reports? - BDO Australia. [online] Bdo.com.au. Available at: http://www.bdo.com.au/resources/newsletters/accounting-news/accounting-news,-june-2014/whats-new-for-june-2014-annual-financial-reports [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Butt, A. (2015). Australian Actuarial Journal - Effect of AASB 119 'Employee Benefits' on Defined Benefit Superannuation Costs Recognised by Sponsoring Employers (Business Collection) - Informit. Australian Actuarial Journal, [online] 14(1), p.97. Available at: http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=253420763105809;res=IELBUS [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Anon, (2015). [online] Available at: http://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/125909/NSWTC15-09_Accounting_for_Long_Service_Leave_and_Annual_Leave.pdf [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Mackerras, C. (2013). Australia and China at 40 , edited by James Reilly and Jingdong Yuan . Sydney: UNSW Press, 2012. xii + 244 pp. AU$49.99 (hardcover). The China Journal, (69), pp.192-194.
Magán Wals, J. and Tardón González, E. (2014). “Google Libros” y la digitalización masiva: La aportación de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 24(1).
Gordon, I. and Lee, J. (2009). Pensions in Australia and South Korea: A comparative analysis. Pensions: An International Journal, 14(4), pp.273-281.
Anon, (2015). [online] Available at: http://investors.adairs.com.au/DownloadFile.axd?file=/Report/ComNews/20150918/01663268.pdf [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].
Anon, (2015). [online] Available at: http://gatewaymining.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Annual-Report-2013.pdf. [Accessed 5 Dec. 2015].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Critical Analysis of the System Design Process System Design Process related to Project- “A Mine Facility”

Quality Improvement Project

Quality Improvment by Using Six Sigma